Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Peter Richardson's avatar

An exceedinly biased and slanted report with the conclusions not drwen rom the evidence described, but concluded by the author as the basis for the writings.

As example, following the description of the CCPA Gender Gap Index, without evidence, it is concluded that that there is 100% male dominance. I could suggest from the tones of the complete essay, that it may equally be concluded thaat it is 100% Female dominance.

Such biasis does not detract from the conclusion, it completely 100% NEGATES that statement of 100% male dominance.

I would appreciate an opinion on this by the Editorial Board of "The Orchard".

Expand full comment
1 more comment...

No posts