A July report that solicited input from leading experts in typography and graphology determined that the the documents Chris Alexander submitted to a parliamentary committee are forgeries.
Chris Alexander looked like a sharp cookie when he was a diplomat. Now he looks likes a crumby creep: bitter enough to conjure sham docs for a smear job, old enough to know the difference between Photoshop and real forgers, and too cheap (broke?) to pay for the real article.
Carol Off had Chris Alexander on a skewer asking about numbers that he could not would not answer. Looks like he’s still there. But fabricating documents!!!
What about that piece of shit, Justin Ling? He was also at that committee hearing as a so-called expert on "Russian interference".
Chris Alexander looked like a sharp cookie when he was a diplomat. Now he looks likes a crumby creep: bitter enough to conjure sham docs for a smear job, old enough to know the difference between Photoshop and real forgers, and too cheap (broke?) to pay for the real article.
Wonder if it's a skill he picked up when he was assigned to Moscow in 1990
So did Ling side with the right's points on russian interference?
I didn’t see his presentation, but I would suspect he did while giving himself enough wiggle room to say he did nothing of that sort.
Carol Off had Chris Alexander on a skewer asking about numbers that he could not would not answer. Looks like he’s still there. But fabricating documents!!!
Chris Alexander is a forgery.